Friday, October 9, 2015

Over the course of history the worst nuclear disaster ever to happen was at Chernobyl.  The event took place on April 26th 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine. The main cause for the nuclear meltdown was that the reactor was being operated with many of the key safety systems turned off, most notably the Emergency Core Cooling System. The catastrophe was classified as a level 7 event which is the highest level there is. The only other disaster to reach this level was the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 20ll. The accident involved over 500,000 workers and costed an estimated 18 billion rubles. 41 people died due to the Chernobyl disaster and many more suffered from cancer due to exposure to radiation. The nuclear fallout spread throughout the surrounding countryside making it dangerous for humans. Scientists believed at the time that the Chernobyl exclusion zone had been subjugated to enough radioactive fallout to severely the ecological balance of the area for decades. However wildlife began to return no more than 20 years after the disaster. Now Chernobyl has become an experiment almost of what would happen if humans were to vanish and nature were to take over.

            A study of the now human free region led by Professor Jim Smith of Portsmouth examines how the wildlife has changed in the Chernobyl area in numbers that appear much higher than they were before the nuclear accident. Aided by some of his colleagues from the Polesky State Radioecological Reserve, they have examined the terrain through aerial surveys. They have spotted many larger mammals including deer, elk, wild boar, and wolves. Along with these aerial surveys, automatic cameras have been placed in 84 positions allowing teams of scientists to observe different types of animals in a 30km zone.
Pack of wolves (Image courtesy of the Tree research project)
            Because of these surveys and cameras we can see the explosion of wildlife in the Chernobyl zone. Professor Smith emphasized that “This does not mean that radiation is good for wildlife. It’s just that the effects of human habitation, including hunting, fishing, and forestry, are a lot worse.” For example the number of wolves was up to seven times higher than nearby nature reserves of comparable size. This is attributed to the lack of hunting in the Chernobyl zone. Some endangered species such as the Przeswalski’s horses were purposely released into the Chernobyl zone as part of a conservation program. From the images from the cameras the horses seem to have adapted well to life within the Chernobyl zone. They seem to be thriving and and moving in larger groups

Przewalski's horses (Image courtesy of the Tree research project)            The Chernobyl incident and aftermath is a great example of how through the subtraction of human activity nature can make a comeback. Through observations on the outside we can see how because of our absence nature is recovering. From stabilizing populations of animals that were thought to be gone from the region to even saving some endangered species we can learn a lessons from the accidental experiment that was provided by Chernobyl. We have the results we just have to make it work.

For more information check out this video - http://www.cbsnews.com/news/chernobyl-the-catastrophe-that-never-ended/

Resources - 
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-34414914
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-32452085
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster#Residual_radioactivity_in_the_environment
http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/152617/